Discussion:
Cain pinched girls rear ?? Her ethnicity ??
(too old to reply)
Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars
2011-11-02 20:22:38 UTC
Permalink
"The National Restaurant Association gave $35000" to the woman in
question. WHY ??
Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars
2011-11-02 20:32:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars
"The National Restaurant Association gave $35000" to the woman in
question.  WHY ??
fuck off
What about answering the question ??
Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars
2011-11-03 09:00:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars
Post by Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars
"The National Restaurant Association gave $35000" to the woman in
question.  WHY ??
fuck off
What about answering the question ??
no
Khadijah@forteinc.com
2011-11-03 13:13:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars
Post by Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars
"The National Restaurant Association gave $35000" to the woman in
question. WHY ??
fuck off
What about answering the question ??
no
OK.

There are a number of possibilities why she recieved that payout:

1) The charge was unfounded, so they decided to fire her for being an
ass. The payout was offered because it was cheaper than the cost of
defending the lawsuit they knew would follow.

2) The charge was founded, but again, the payout was cheaper than the
inevitable lawsuit

Now, here's my question: Who cares? None of this is anywhere's near as
bad as the Lewinsky incident, and if the Dems were willing to accept
that sort of behavior from the President, why are they whining about
something as minor as a passing comment that made some chick (allegedly)
uncomfortable?

Khadijah
ray
2011-11-03 13:53:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by ***@forteinc.com
Post by Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars
Post by Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars
"The National Restaurant Association gave $35000" to the woman in
question. WHY ??
fuck off
What about answering the question ??
no
OK.
1) The charge was unfounded, so they decided to fire her for being an
ass. The payout was offered because it was cheaper than the cost of
defending the lawsuit they knew would follow.
2) The charge was founded, but again, the payout was cheaper than the
inevitable lawsuit
Now, here's my question: Who cares? None of this is anywhere's near as
bad as the Lewinsky incident, and if the Dems were willing to accept
that sort of behavior from the President, why are they whining about
something as minor as a passing comment that made some chick (allegedly)
uncomfortable?
This is so typical of any presidential election. Bush with his 20 year
old DUI, Kerry with throwing fake medals over the White House wall,
Gore's family who had oil investments. Who can take this nonsense
anymore? We all know what this is all about. The only people who don't
know what this is about are the Wall Street losers crapping in their own
sleeping bags.
--
Barock Insane Obama: The greatest joke America ever played on itself.
ØBAMA'S Abominable Presidency
2011-11-03 14:52:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars
Post by Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars
"The National Restaurant Association gave $35000" to the woman in
question. WHY ??
fuck off
What about answering the question ??
Clinton Payment Ends Jones Suit
January 13, 1999
President Clinton sent an $850,000 check to Paula Jones, financed nearly
half the settlement with his own money.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/pjones/keystories.htm
Transition Zone
2011-11-05 18:05:00 UTC
Permalink
On Nov 3, 10:52 am, ØBAMA'S Abominable Presidency <Another
Post by ØBAMA'S Abominable Presidency
Post by Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars
Post by Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars
"The National Restaurant Association gave $35000" to the woman in
question.  WHY ??
fuck off
What about answering the question ??
Clinton
The answer is Cain is hiding something. And it will come out !!
Sage2
2011-11-05 20:34:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Transition Zone
On Nov 3, 10:52 am, ØBAMA'S Abominable Presidency <Another
Post by ØBAMA'S Abominable Presidency
Post by Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars
Post by Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars
"The National Restaurant Association gave $35000" to the woman in
question.  WHY ??
fuck off
What about answering the question ??
Clinton
The answer is Cain is hiding something.  And it will come out !!
It seems now that the accuser is hiding something because her
lawyer claims she will not go public. A big political ado 'bout
nothin' from the left leechbagger liberals and the DNC !

BeamMeUpScotty
2011-11-02 21:30:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars
"The National Restaurant Association gave $35000" to the woman in
question. WHY ??
She was really really good....
--
Kill da`Wabbit
Sage2
2011-11-02 22:27:22 UTC
Permalink
On Nov 2, 5:30 pm, BeamMeUpScotty
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
Post by Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars
"The National Restaurant Association gave $35000" to the woman in
question.  WHY ??
She was really really good....
--
Kill da`Wabbit
You liberals always have problems with comprehension. It was
simply a 'severance' pay by all media accounts.
A 'severance' pay is usually given in lieu of an untimely notice or a
'severance' package when laid off or termination. Most Companies have
non disclosure agreements in such cases. Does not mean there was
sexual harassment, but it could be that both women were let go for
false accusations. Even in this case neither party is allowed to
divulge the agreement so both parties will be protected. This minutia
was made a story by Politico without disclosing sources, witnesses,
nor any proof. You gullible little leeches you ! Cain will not only
survive this manufactured crap but will bring him even further ahead
in the polls.
If there was any legitimacy to these accusations, these two
woman would have sought legal action back in the day. With a half
decent lawyer they could have gotten hundreds of thousands. It's
obvious to anyone with a real brain that it's a political mud throw.
Why didn't these so called victims not come out with their allegations
when Herman ran for the Senate years ago. All of a sudden they are
good little citizens, or are they looking for the big pay day by the
squirmy DNC. Dirty Nasty Cunts !
e***@gmail.com
2011-11-03 15:04:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sage2
On Nov 2, 5:30 pm, BeamMeUpScotty
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
Post by Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars
"The National Restaurant Association gave $35000" to the woman in
question.  WHY ??
She was really really good....
--
Kill da`Wabbit
          You liberals always have problems with comprehension. It was
simply a 'severance' pay by all media accounts.
A year's severance pay? To someone without a contract? To someone
who brings a sexual harassment claim? Yeah, sure.
Post by Sage2
A 'severance' pay is usually given in lieu of an untimely notice or a
'severance' package when laid off or termination. Most Companies have
non disclosure agreements in such cases. Does not mean there was
sexual harassment, but it could be that both women were let go for
false accusations.
So why pay them?
Post by Sage2
Even in this case neither party is allowed to
divulge the agreement so both parties will be protected.
So Cain violated this?
Post by Sage2
This minutia
was made a story by Politico without disclosing sources, witnesses,
nor any proof.
You mean like Kerry and the Swift Boats, Gore and a sexual harassment
charge last year, Clinton and "murders" in Arkansas?
Post by Sage2
You gullible little leeches you !  Cain will not only
survive this manufactured crap but will bring him even further ahead
in the polls.
Maybe among conservatives, but I bet it turns moderates and
independents off.
Post by Sage2
          If there was any legitimacy to these accusations, these two
woman would have sought legal action back in the day.
A lot of corporations settle.
Post by Sage2
With a half
decent lawyer they could have gotten hundreds of thousands.
Maybe. Most lawsuits get settled before court however.
Post by Sage2
It's
obvious to anyone with a real brain that it's a political mud throw.
Why didn't these so called victims not come out with their allegations
when Herman ran for the Senate years ago.
If a woman doesn't report rape right away, it didn't happen?
Post by Sage2
All of a sudden they are
good little citizens, or are they looking for the big pay day by the
squirmy DNC. Dirty Nasty Cunts !
James
2011-11-04 02:35:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by e***@gmail.com
On Nov 2, 5:30 pm, BeamMeUpScotty
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
Post by Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars
"The National Restaurant Association gave $35000" to the woman in
question. WHY ??
She was really really good....
--
Kill da`Wabbit
You liberals always have problems with comprehension. It was
simply a 'severance' pay by all media accounts.
A year's severance pay? To someone without a contract? To someone
who brings a sexual harassment claim? Yeah, sure.
A 'severance' pay is usually given in lieu of an untimely notice or a
'severance' package when laid off or termination. Most Companies have
non disclosure agreements in such cases. Does not mean there was
sexual harassment, but it could be that both women were let go for
false accusations.
So why pay them?
Even in this case neither party is allowed to
divulge the agreement so both parties will be protected.
So Cain violated this?
This minutia
was made a story by Politico without disclosing sources, witnesses,
nor any proof.
You mean like Kerry and the Swift Boats, Gore and a sexual harassment
charge last year, Clinton and "murders" in Arkansas?
How did those come out? Especially Kerry and the swift boats.
Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars
2011-11-03 15:55:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sage2
You liberals
Oooohh, oh yes. Us liberals. Us liberals. Us liberals. Us liberals.
As always.
Post by Sage2
Even in this case neither party is allowed to divulge the agreement so both parties will be protected.
Then why did Cain say that, instead of "it never even happened" then?

GOP are liars. Always.
GinniThomas
2011-11-03 18:52:07 UTC
Permalink
Hermie pinched my heinie and I got all tingly inside!
Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars
2011-11-03 15:53:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars
"The National Restaurant Association gave $35000" to the woman in
question.  WHY ??
Maybe because she thinks money in trade for sexual misbehavior is
acceptable, once he had the fun she expected payment.
Why couldn't Cain say that from the start? Instead of "oh, it didn't
happen", then "oh, well, they claimed it but it was false", then "oh,
me and my so-called general counsel negotiated a settlement".

Republican deniers are such liars.
Loading...